Tes Provision Map alternatives for UK schools: where the map stops

MeritDocs manages the working special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) record across the cycle: staff can map provision and its cost, maintain pupil passports, create structured SEN Support Plans and profound and multiple learning difficulties (PMLD) plans, review what changed, report on the current position, and migrate legacy records. artificial intelligence (AI) helps with authoring and best-fit mapping, while versions, approvals, audit history and exports stay under school control.

Every customer can start with a 28-day free trial, using the school's own cohort and documents before choosing a paid licence.

Pupil identities and documents are encrypted before storage, data stays in the UK and European Union (EU), AI drafting runs in the EU with zero retention, pupil data is not used to train AI, and schools get role controls, two-factor authentication (2FA), single sign-on (SSO), audit logs, a Data Protection Act (DPA), Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) notes, export, and full deletion on exit. Staff approve every draft.

Tes Provision Map remains a credible option for established provision mapping. Other alternatives include Senflow for managed switching, SEN Master for target-led mapping, ProvisionIQ for wider collaboration, WeaveONE for a broad SEND platform, and Student Radar for SEND records beside wider pupil context.

First, what does “Tes” mean here?

This guide compares Tes Provision Map, not the whole Tes ecosystem. Tes also covers resources, recruitment, training, timetabling, safeguarding, and other software. A SEND documentation platform is not a replacement for all of it.

The comparison is how schools manage SEND records, support plans, provision, reviews, access, migration, and evidence. For England, the reference point is the SEND Code of Practice, not a software compliance claim. Other UK nations need their own framework.

Tes Provision Map alternatives at a glance

MeritDocs is strongest when a school wants one lean platform for the whole SEND provision workflow, not just a place to store a provision map. It combines the map, pupil record, plan, passport, review and report.

Tes Provision Map alternatives compared for UK schools

Swipe to compare

Tes Provision Map alternatives compared for UK schools
Platform	Drafting	Import and migration	SEND workflow	Data protection	Price
MeritDocs	✓ AI-assisted, evidence-grounded plans with staff approval	✅ Plans and pupil data imported; unmapped content reviewed	✓ Costed provision, passports, plans, reviews, reporting and controlled records	✅ Encrypted before storage; UK/EU locations; no pupil-data training; EU zero-retention drafting	£75 per school/month annually £75 per school/month annually; 28-day free trial; 10% MAT discount
Tes Provision Map	❌ Not stated as a core feature	? Not publicly stated	✅ Plans, passports, targets, reports and transition	? Request written security and hosting detail	Quote Quote
SEN Master	❌ Not stated as a core feature	? Not publicly stated	✅ Provision mapping, EHCP tracking, targets and deadlines	? Request written security and hosting detail	Six-week trial Six-week trial; standard price not published
Senflow	❌ Evidence drafting not stated as the core offer	✅ Migration is central; export, import and verification advertised	✓ SEND workflow, deadlines, reviews, reporting and supported migration	? Request written security and hosting detail	School-agreed subscription School-agreed subscription
ProvisionIQ	❌ Not stated as a core feature	? Not publicly stated	✅ Multi-agency, parent, analytics and governance workflows	? Request written security and hosting detail	Demo and quote Demo and quote
WeaveONE SendConnect360	❌ Not stated as a core feature	? Not publicly stated	✅ Broad SEND, family, wellbeing and statutory workflows	✅ Public trust page describes London hosting, encryption and human approval	£2,588 to £10,688/year excluding VAT £2,588 to £10,688/year excluding VAT
Student Radar SEND	❌ Not stated as a core feature	? Not publicly stated	✅ Registers, plans, reviews, evidence and pupil voice	? Request written security and hosting detail	£4.25/pupil/year £4.25/pupil/year; £250 minimum

The symbols show what each supplier publicly describes in the sources reviewed. A question mark means the detail was not clear enough to verify, so schools should confirm it in writing and test one complete pupil journey before choosing a platform.

What schools should test before choosing an alternative

The useful test is one complete pupil journey: evidence in, document drafted, staff review, version stored, review completed, and export out.

Public verified reviews on EdTech Impact praise Tes Provision Map's centralisation, staff visibility, target libraries, reporting, and transition. They also mention setup, training, reporting friction, and manual authoring. This is qualitative feedback, not a prevalence study. Those points make the right comparison broader than storage: test provision, passports, plans, review history, reporting and staff workload in one complete pupil journey.

Follow one pupil from source evidence to a current, staff-usable record. Do not settle for a dashboard tour.

1. MeritDocs: best for lean, AI-enhanced whole-school SEND management

MeritDocs is a direct category fit when a school wants to run the full SEND provision workflow in a leaner platform. It covers costed provision mapping, pupil passports, plans, review cycles, reporting and migration, with AI helping staff turn recorded information into usable documents.

MeritDocs' differentiator is the controlled path through that workflow. It imports plans and pupil data, maps information into the pupil record, helps create structured UK SEND documents from recorded evidence, and keeps provision, cost, source material, unmapped content, versions, review context, access, approvals and exports connected. Imports are reviewed rather than silently accepted, and staff remain responsible for the final record.

MeritDocs is focused on SEND provision management rather than a teaching-resource marketplace. Document import, pupil-data import and Google Workspace sign-in are live. The product workflow also covers provision maps, pupil passports, plans, reviews and reporting; other management information system (MIS) and identity connections are shown clearly as planned on the integrations page.

Security is part of the same product decision. MeritDocs encrypts pupil identities and document bodies before storage, keeps data in the UK and EU, runs drafting inside the EU under zero-retention terms, does not use pupil data to train AI, and gives schools role controls, 2FA, SSO, audit history, export, and full deletion on exit. The security page provides the public summary, with the DPA, DPIA notes, and further technical detail available to the school or Data Protection Officers (DPOs).

For the workload behind this decision, read how special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) software should reduce paperwork without losing accuracy.

Best for: a SENCO, headteacher or multi-academy trusts (MATs) leader who wants one lean SEND platform to manage provision, passports, plans, reviews, reporting and migration, with AI reducing repetitive authoring without removing professional control.

See pricing or review the security and data controls.

2. Tes Provision Map: best for established provision mapping

Tes Provision Map fits schools wanting established provision mapping with learning plans, pupil passports, interventions, reports, reminders, staff communication, and transition. Its live product page advertises more than 1,000 SMART targets and MIS connections.

Test the authoring and setup experience carefully. Reviews praise organisation and access but also mention setup effort, training, reporting limitations, and remaining manual work. The live Tes page asks schools to request a quote, so do not treat an older third-party price as current official pricing.

Best for: schools that want a known provision-mapping and reporting model, especially where existing staff already understand the workflow.

3. SEN Master: best for provision mapping with a visible target library

SEN Master focuses on provision mapping, Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) tracking, targets, strategies, teacher visibility, and review deadlines. It advertises hundreds of SMART targets, a six-week free trial, and connections with SIMS, Arbor, Bromcom, and ScholarPack.

The public page does not give a standard price or enough detail on accessibility, hosting, sub-processors, or support response times. Ask for written answers before approval.

Best for: a school whose immediate need is a provision map, deadline tracking, and a browsable target and strategy starting point.

4. Senflow: best for supported switching and migration

Senflow is the closest like-for-like comparison in this list: a whole-SEND workflow focused on deadlines, provision, reviews, reporting and supported migration. Its switching guide covers export, MIS connection, import, verification, parallel running, timing and phased MAT rollout.

Test those claims against your own plans, historical reviews, attachments, pupil voice, and exports. Confirm support, notice periods, and post-migration help.

Best for: schools that want a whole-SEND workflow and a managed move away from an existing system, with implementation support central to the decision.

5. ProvisionIQ: best for broader collaboration and governance

ProvisionIQ describes a wider SEND operating system covering provision, interventions, multi-agency and parent collaboration, analytics, governance, and reform-oriented workflows. That may suit trusts seeking a broader inclusion system.

Its public claims need date and scope checking. Confirm what is live, what is early access, what is contractual, and what depends on future policy.

Best for: schools and trusts that need multi-agency, parent, governance and analytics workflows in addition to core SEND provision management.

6. WeaveONE SendConnect360: best for a broad whole-school SEND platform

WeaveONE SendConnect360 offers clear public pricing. Its pricing page lists the bands, while its trust page describes London hosting, encryption, row-level security, personally identifiable information (PII) redaction, and human approval. The product also covers parent updates, timetable, wellbeing, safeguarding, and statutory dates.

The limitation is scope and cost. A school seeking only support-plan authoring or migration may be buying more platform than it needs. Compare implementation burden, not just feature count.

Best for: schools and MATs looking for a broad SEND operating layer that reaches beyond plans and provision into family, timetable, safeguarding, and whole-school workflows.

7. Student Radar SEND: best for SEND plus whole-child context

Student Radar SEND publishes an entry price of £4.25 per pupil per year, subject to a £250 minimum and excluding VAT. Its SEND workflow connects the register, EHCP and SEN Support views, plans, provision, reviews, outcome evidence, multi-agency work, and wider pupil context.

The public feature page does not state hosting or formal accessibility conformance. Ask for the DPA, sub-processors, retention, deletion, migration, support, and a sample export.

Best for: schools that want SEND information connected to the wider pupil record rather than held in a separate specialist silo.

Which alternative fits each reader?

If you lead information technology (IT) or data protection

Start with the data, not the dashboard. Ask each supplier:

Where is pupil data stored and processed?
Which sub-processors and AI providers are involved?
Is pupil data used for model training or product improvement?
Can you provide the DPA, DPIA support, retention schedule, deletion process, and breach procedure?
Is access role-based, and can two-factor authentication be enforced?
Are access, edits, approvals, imports, exports, and failed attempts audited?
Which MIS and identity connections are live today, rather than planned?
Can the school export structured data and attachments in a usable format?
What accessibility statement or conformance evidence is available?

MeritDocs makes this distinction clearly: it is a dedicated SEND management platform, not a replacement for every MIS function. Document import, pupil-data import and Google Workspace sign-in are live; other MIS and identity connections are shown with their current status on the integrations page. For another supplier, ask for the same level of clarity.

If you are a headteacher or MAT leader

Compare the whole cost of adoption:

licence and VAT;
implementation and migration;
staff training and cover time;
data-cleaning work;
parallel running during the switch;
support after launch;
integrations and add-ons;
exit, export, and deletion.

A low per-pupil price can still be expensive if staff must rebuild records manually. A broader platform can be poor value if the school uses one module. Compare the workflow after one term, not just the feature list.

If you are a SENCO

Test the part vendors often show least clearly: the writing and review work.

Can you start with existing evidence rather than a blank form?
Can the system preserve pupil, parent, staff, and professional voice?
Does it show what did not map during an import?
Can staff see the current version without editing the record?
Are review dates and changes visible?
Can a review link back to a baseline rather than create an isolated document?
Can you produce a useful record for a parent meeting, annual review, handover, or supply briefing?
Can you export the record if the school leaves?

A safe switching checklist

Before cancelling an existing contract:

Check the renewal date and notice period.
Request a complete export in writing before committing to a replacement.
Ask for structured records and attachments separately.
Keep the original files and a read-only copy of the old system during the transition.
Test three to five real pupil records, including one complicated case.
Check counts, dates, versions, outcomes, reviews, attachments, and pupil voice.
Run a small parallel period before closing the old account.
Agree who owns the migration checks and who signs off the final record.
Confirm staff training by role, not one generic demonstration.
Get export, deletion, support, and pricing terms in writing.

Frequently asked questions

IT: Does a Tes alternative need to integrate with our MIS?

Not always. Confirm what will be imported, what stays manual, and which connections are live today. If there is no MIS sync, agree who owns spreadsheet reconciliation.

IT: What security evidence should a school request?

MeritDocs gives procurement teams a DPA and DPIA support pack, alongside technical detail on storage, AI processing, access, audit, export, and deletion. Its public security position is specific: UK and EU storage, EU zero-retention drafting, no training on pupil data, encryption before storage, role controls, 2FA, SSO, and a full audit trail. For any other supplier, ask for equivalent evidence rather than accepting a generic compliance label.

Headteacher: How much does the AI-enhanced SEND platform cost?

The current public pricing page starts at £75 per month per school, billed annually. Every customer can start with a 28-day free trial before choosing a paid licence. The quote varies by school size, SEND register, and support needs, with a 10% MAT discount advertised.

Headteacher: Is a broader platform automatically better than a specialist one?

No. Breadth can reduce system sprawl, but it can also add implementation and maintenance work. Choose the smallest platform that solves the real workflow.

SENCO: Can the AI-enhanced SEND platform move existing Word files, Portable Document Format files (PDFs), scans, and paper plans?

Yes. MeritDocs imports existing plans and pupil data, maps information into structured records, and shows what needs review. Professional approval remains part of the workflow because SEND documents vary between schools and local authorities.

SENCO: Does a Tes alternative need a target library?

No. A library can reduce blank-page work, but staff should be able to adapt targets to the pupil and local language. It should support professional judgement, not replace it.

Questions schools ask before leaving Provision Map

Will we lose our existing Provision Map records if we switch?

MeritDocs is built to make that switch manageable. Export the old records, then use MeritDocs' import workflow to bring plans, pupil data, provision, passports and review context into structured records with human review of the result. The DPA and security materials cover export, deletion, and the school's continuing control of its data.

Will staff have to retype every plan?

No. Import the existing plans and pupil data, map them into the new records, and review exceptions. Because formats vary, do not accept a promise of perfect automatic migration.

Can we run the new platform alongside Provision Map?

Yes. Run a short parallel test with three to five real pupil records. Compare dates, versions, attachments, outcomes, and review history before closing the old system.

What if we are locked into a Tes contract?

Check the renewal date and notice period first. Test the alternative, request the export in writing, and agree the timetable before the old account is near closure.

Do we need to replace all our Tes products?

No. Tes Provision Map is one part of the wider Tes ecosystem. Assess the SEND records workflow separately rather than replacing every Tes product.

Is this a like-for-like replacement for Provision Map?

No, but it is a like-for-like category comparison on SEND workflow. Tes Provision Map is a credible fit for established provision mapping, targets, interventions and reporting. MeritDocs covers the same core provision workflow and adds AI-assisted plan authoring, costed mapping, controlled migration and governed document/version workflows.

What if our staff already like Provision Map?

Keep what works. Switch only if the new workflow removes a real problem, such as manual authoring, fragmented records, weak migration, or version control. Demonstrate one complete pupil journey to staff.

Is the AI-enhanced SEND platform just another AI tool?

No. It helps structure evidence and draft documents, while staff review and approve the result. The surrounding workflow keeps source material, warnings, versions, review dates, access, and export visible.

Will the AI write unsupported claims about a pupil?

MeritDocs is designed to keep drafting tied to recorded evidence rather than a blank prompt. Source material, unmapped content, pupil and parent voice, versions, and approval remain visible so staff can check the document before it is used.

Do we need a live MIS integration before we can start?

No. Document import, pupil-data import, and Google Workspace sign-in are live. Other MIS connections are shown with their current status on the current integrations page.

Will our IT lead need to install software?

No. MeritDocs is browser-based, with no software for the IT lead to install. Have the school's Google Workspace domain and SEND register ready, then the administrator controls access. Security and data protection are built into the service through encrypted storage, UK and EU processing, EU zero-retention drafting, role policies, 2FA, SSO, audit logs, the DPA, and DPIA support.

Is pupil data used to train AI models?

No. MeritDocs does not use pupil data to train AI models. Drafting runs inside the EU under zero-retention terms, and the drafting data is discarded after use. The DPA and DPIA notes are available for the school's procurement and DPO records.

Is the data hosted in the UK?

Yes. MeritDocs stores and processes pupil data in the UK and EU, with AI drafting inside the EU. The public security and pricing pages set out the locations, encryption, zero-retention drafting, and no-training position.

Will teachers and support staff need extensive training?

MeritDocs includes setup, migration, and training. Onboarding should match the roles using the system, but the school is not left to work out the migration alone.

Is the price higher than Provision Map?

Tes Provision Map does not publish a current official price and asks schools to request a quote. The current public price for the AI-enhanced SEND platform starts at £75 per month per school, billed annually. Compare migration and staff time as well as the licence.

Can a MAT switch one school at a time?

Usually. Pilot the export and workflow in one representative school, document the mapping decisions, then roll out in waves. Confirm the MAT quote and discount directly.

What happens if we leave later?

MeritDocs lets schools export documents as Word, plain text, or print-ready PDF, and deletes the school's data in full when it leaves. The DPA covers data return, deletion, and written deletion certification on request, so the school is not locked in.

How do we know the switch actually reduced workload?

Measure time to create a support plan, find the current record, complete reviews, resolve import exceptions, and train staff. A new interface is not proof of improvement.

The short recommendation

MeritDocs should be one of the first products most schools test. It is a direct Tes Provision Map alternative for the full SEND provision workflow: costed provision mapping, pupil passports, plans, reviews, reporting and migration, with AI-assisted authoring and clear access, audit, export and deletion controls. The advantage is a leaner way to manage the category, not a claim that AI removes professional judgement.

Tes Provision Map remains a sensible choice for established provision mapping, target libraries, intervention tracking and familiar reporting. SEN Master is worth comparing for target-led mapping. Senflow is a whole-SEND workflow option with a strong migration story. ProvisionIQ, WeaveONE and Student Radar make more sense when the school wants additional collaboration, family, governance or whole-child layers. Test one real pupil journey from provision and cost through an approved record and export, not a feature tour.

Ready to test the switch?

Request a demo, ask about rollout, or work out the right setup for your school or trust. This goes straight to the team. We reply within one working day.

Tell us about your setting

Prefer email?

Demo and sales enquiries reach the team: contact@meritdocs.com

Sending this to your DPO?

The security page answers what most DPOs ask first, and the full technical detail is available on request.

Sources and method

This article uses competitor product pages only to describe what those suppliers publicly offer. They are not used to support claims about MeritDocs, the wider SEND software market, workload prevalence, or comparative security. MeritDocs product and security claims come from current first-party pages and approved technical and data-protection documentation. EdTech Impact is used separately for qualitative review evidence about Tes Provision Map. Competitor claims are labelled; MeritDocs' recommendation is editorial analysis based on its AI-enhanced SEND management workflow and published controls. No review or forum wording is reproduced verbatim.